Okay, Glasses Gurus– It’s time to help me pick out my new frames again! Last time around, a number of you commented on the blah-ness of some of the frames in the photos. You helpfully (and nicely!) pointed out that those particular frames did not have what it takes to grace my face for the next half decade or so. I heard you loud and clear. The last thing I want is to live for the next five years without having even one person say ‘wow– I like your glasses!’ or ‘there goes Dana, the girl with the cool glasses’. (Not like anybody would actually say that. Out loud. Except for maybe me. If I had cool glasses, that is. Moving along.)
Many people also commented that all of the glasses sat too low on my face. There are three reasons for this: 1. The bridge of my nose is very low in relation to the position of my eyes. 2. My eyebrows are very high, creating the illusion of even more space between my brows and my frames. 3. My ears not only ‘hang low’ (as described in that horrid ‘do your ears hang low?’ scouting song… thankfully, they do not also ‘wobble to and fro’, and I have never once been able to tie them in a knot OR tie them in a bow.), but they also sit at two different levels of low. Lopsided ears. It makes for great experiences shopping for glasses. Clearly, I am swimming in a pool that is positively teeming with superior genes. And the moral of this story is: barring any nose jobs or radical ‘ear placement corrective surgery’, my glasses will most likely sit low. (Indeed, my current glasses sit low, but it is less noticeable because they are translucent.) Together, we are simply trying to pick a new pair of glasses that will minimize the damage.
Finally, I had a few people ask me what I was looking for in a pair of glasses to begin with. I understand it can be hard to pass judgment on a selection of frames if you don’t even know what I’m hoping to find! Hence, here is my abridged List of Things I Must Have (Or Must Not Have) in a New Pair of Glasses:
- Frames must be cool and stylish enough to garner random compliments from strangers on the street. This sounds like a bizarre and slightly conceited criterion, but I can’t help it. I have had pretty cool glasses for the last 10 years*, and now I simply refuse to blend in, frames-wise. (*We will not speak of my glasses before then. Suffice it to say: they were very early 1990s (think early Bill Gates-esque glasses on a 12 year old) and they gave me a rash. All over my forehead. Curse nickel coating!)
- Frames must not be outlandish enough to garner hushed whispers about their horribleness behind my back. There are three main reactions to glasses:
1. Appreciation and/or admiration: can be silent or spoken. Example: “Do those frames ever look great on you!” or “My inside voice silently approves of that woman’s choice of glasses.”
2. Repulsion and/or nasty gossip: usually done in an inside voice, but sometimes slips past the filter of Better Judgment right into the outside voice. Example: “Yikes! Those glasses make her look cross-eyed!” or “Wow! Your new frames are… different!”
3. No reaction at all. Nothing about the frames stands out, for better or for worse.
… as you might well imagine, I am going for Reaction #1. I’m not interested in Reactions 2 or 3, but I’m particularly not looking to invoke Reaction #2.
- Shape/colour of frame must not cause me to look any of the following: cross-eyed, sad, angry, dowdy, shy, aggressive, or as though I am on my way to church (though I’m sure Jesus would appreciate a nice looking pair of frames, too. Ed. note: forgive the sacrilege. Cough.)
- Shape of frame must compliment the fabulous arch of my excellently groomed eyebrows. Pavi from Sunrise Salon & Aesthetics does an admirable job of curbing my inner Bert (of Sesame Street fame), and I definitely want my glasses to showcase her work. (PS: For anybody interested in trying out threading in Victoria, it is cheap, cheap, cheap! 10 bucks gets you the initial eyebrow shape and 6 bucks gets you groomed every 2 to 3 weeks after that. I highly recommend it.)
OK, OK, on with the actual frames. I visited two boutique shops in Victoria this weekend: ArtSee in Oak Bay and Goo Goo Goggles on Fort Street. Here are the latest exhibits from which you may choose: (warning: photo heavy post ahead. Photos taken before the mould spores colonized my eyelids.)
Exhibit A: Kliik, Kliik
Here are some two-toned Kliik frames. The good news? I love the colours and the general shape of them… kind of cats-eye, kind of fitting-with-my-beautiful-eyebrows. The bad news?
Is it just me, or are these frames a little too small and a little too cross-eyed inducing? It could be this particular photo, but it looks like they sit too far on the right hand side of my face– like they should be stretched a bit to cover my whole left eye, too. (Because ultimately, my left eye would love to see clearly as well. My right eye can’t have all the fun.) Discuss.
Exhibit B: Why Am I Even Including These As An Exhibit?
These glasses are maroon-ish on the outside and turquoise on the inside.
I tried them on right before we went to the movie theatre. Sadly, they were the best frames at that particular store. Full disclosure: We hadn’t visited the boutique stores yet. This was still at The Mall. Suddenly, everything makes sense again.
Exhibit C: Finally, We Are At A Boutique Store And Do Not Have To Take Photos Underneath The Fluorescent Lights!
The coolest part about these next frames is that they function as two (or more!) different pairs. (And frame options in a single pair = value.) Different skins can be clipped onto the front of the frames, magically transforming them from simple daywear to sassy, night-on-the-town facial companions.
I have to say it: I love those silver squares! Plus there’s something about having different clip options available that tugs hard on those spendthrift heart strings of mine. (These are the same heart strings that are responsible for buying toilet paper in bulk and random household items on sale just because they are ON SALE. I am a sucker for sales and Val-U. Must be my peasant genetics kicking in.)
Exhibit D: These Looked A Lot Better In Person.
These frames are made of titanium– a virtual guarantee that they will not induce an allergic rash on my nose and forehead. Being made of titanium is also a virtual guarantee that they will be the most expensive frames of the bunch ($962 with lenses!!! NEARLY ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS!!!). But I digress.
Truth be told, these glasses looked great at the store. I tried them on in green and was pretty much sold on them (the green ones). Marty and the optician drew on the lenses to customize the shape of them (mainly to make them less wide), and we even discussed the pros and cons of Transitions lenses in such a frame. (I was going to get them with Transitions. The optician even stood outside for a while with us to do a real time demonstration of how Transitions lenses work. They’re pretty cool.)
But, then we got home and I saw the horrible photos:
Although the lens is nearly invisible in person, it positively glows in photos. (Hi, Marty! Need a mirror? No problem! Just look into my magical glasses!) If I could avoid ever taking a photo of myself again, I might consider these frames. But looking back on all of the photos, I’m kind of disappointed. I remember them being much cooler than they seem here. Sigh.
Exhibit E: Yes, There Are Still More Exhibits
Love the pink. Love the red. I’ve always loved pink and red together, even when my best friend in Grade 4 insisted to me that pink and red clash together. I didn’t care then. I still don’t care. I love me the pinks and reds. Can’t we all just get along?
The problem with these frames:
They fight with my face. I think so, anyway. Too thick. Thoughts?
Exhibit F: I Promise There Are Only A Few More Exhibits
These are another pair of glasses that unfortunately seem to suffer in front of the camera. They looked way nicer in the store. We just had a hard time getting a non-blurry photo.
Again, they seemed and felt very stylish in the store, but I can’t really demonstrate that with the blurry photos:
Also, I’m having a hard time figuring out what is ‘too small’, considering my current glasses are on the large size. What do you say? Are these too small?
Exhibit G: Finally, The Final Exhibit!
These glasses are a dusty purple shade. I like the colour, but I’m also a bit leery of it, only because I’ve been in lilac frames for the past 5 years!

It was the end of a long day, and we were getting tired of trying on glasses. Hence, the facial expression. And yes, I know the glasses are sitting low.
I quite liked these frames– how the top corners were just lenses, how the temple pieces left the frame whenever the hell they felt like it, how the temple pieces were so thin, instead of thick like I’m used to:

More glare. Sorry. Also, please disregard greasy nose. Must be lingering Essence of Blizzard seeping through...
My biggest concern with these final frames is that they are too much like my current frames. It mostly has to do with colour. The frames also came in green, but unfortunately, it was not a green that complimented my skin tone at all. It was more of a neon lime green.
OK- Phew! Are you still with me? Fabulous! The same questions as before:
- What frame is your favourite and might cause you to approach me, a random stranger, to say so?
- What frame(s) belong in the ‘definitely not’ box? Why? (Note: costing NEARLY ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS is not a valid reason. It should be a great reason, but for the sake of argument, let’s pretend I have an Elton John budget to spend on glasses.)
- Do any of the frames seem to violate my Cardinal Rules of Glasses Shopping? Discuss.
Once again, THANK YOU for your input! Together, we will tackle this beast and emerge with fabulous new glasses to boot! OK, OK, I will emerge with fabulous glasses. You knew what I meant…
















